One World, Many Divisions: A “State of the Union” of the United Nations
Adediran Babajide, President/CEO
Carlsron Initiative for Peace and Human Rights (CIPEHR)
“The United Nations is not weakened because it is universal; it is challenged because universality requires consensus among diverse national interests.”
Abstract
The United Nations (UN) remains the world’s foremost institution for promoting peace, security, development, and international cooperation. Yet growing geopolitical rivalry, institutional constraints, and an increasingly multipolar international order have exposed significant challenges to its effectiveness. Using the concept of a “State of the Union,” this article evaluates the UN’s institutional health by examining its achievements, persistent divisions, and future prospects. It argues that although the Organization continues to play an indispensable role in global governance, its long-term credibility and effectiveness depend upon meaningful reforms, renewed political commitment, and stronger multilateral cooperation.
Keywords: United Nations; Global Governance; UN Reform; Multilateralism; Security Council; International Law; Peacekeeping; Multipolarity.
Introduction: A Union of Nations, Not Always United
The United Nations was established in 1945 to preserve international peace, promote cooperation, and prevent another global conflict. More than eight decades later, it remains the only universal organization where every sovereign state can participate in shaping international responses to global challenges. Yet the Organization increasingly reflects the political divisions of the international system it was created to serve. Viewing the UN through the idea of a “State of the Union” provides a useful framework for assessing its institutional health, achievements, and weaknesses. While the Organization continues to make significant contributions to humanitarian action, development, and international law, geopolitical rivalry and structural limitations have constrained its ability to respond effectively to many contemporary crises. This article evaluates the UN’s current condition and considers how it can remain effective in an increasingly interconnected and multipolar world.
Achievements That Continue to Hold the United Nations Together
Despite frequent criticism, the United Nations has made significant contributions to international peace and global development since its establishment. One of its earliest achievements was supporting the global process of decolonization. Through the General Assembly and the Trusteeship Council, the Organization helped facilitate the transition of many territories to independence, transforming the international system into one based on sovereign equality and universal membership (Claude, 1966).
The UN has also become the world’s leading humanitarian institution. Agencies such as the World Food Programme (WFP), the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), and the World Health Organization (WHO) provide food assistance, healthcare, education, refugee protection, and emergency relief to millions of people each year. Their work has demonstrated the practical value of multilateral cooperation during conflicts, natural disasters, disease outbreaks, and other humanitarian emergencies (Fidler, 2019).
Another enduring contribution is the promotion of sustainable development. Through the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the UN has provided governments with a common framework for addressing poverty, education, public health, gender equality, environmental sustainability, and international partnership. Although implementation has varied across regions, these initiatives have encouraged greater international cooperation and policy coordination than would otherwise have been possible.
The Organization has equally strengthened international law and global norms. Instruments such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, and numerous human rights treaties have established internationally accepted standards for state behaviour. While enforcement often depends on political will, these legal frameworks continue to influence national legislation, judicial decisions, and international diplomacy.
Peacekeeping has become another defining feature of the United Nations. Since the first UN peacekeeping mission in 1948, peacekeepers have monitored ceasefires, supported elections, protected civilians, and assisted post-conflict reconstruction in many parts of the world. Although some missions have faced operational difficulties, peacekeeping remains one of the Organization’s most visible contributions to international peace and security (Durch, 2019).
Taken together, these achievements demonstrate that the United Nations remains far more than a forum for diplomatic debate. It has become an operational institution whose agencies deliver tangible benefits across humanitarian assistance, development, public health, human rights, and peacebuilding. These successes explain why, despite repeated criticism, no viable alternative has emerged to replace the UN as the centerpiece of contemporary global governance.
Sources of Division in an Increasingly Multipolar World
While the United Nations has achieved considerable success in advancing international cooperation, it also reflects the divisions that characterize global politics. Unlike a national government, the Organization cannot act independently of its member states. Its effectiveness therefore depends largely on the willingness of governments to cooperate, compromise, and place collective interests alongside national priorities.
One of the principal challenges confronting the UN today is the changing distribution of global power. The international system has gradually evolved from the relative dominance of the post-Cold War era to a more competitive multipolar order in which several major powers exercise significant influence over global affairs (Acharya, 2018). As strategic competition has intensified, reaching consensus on major international issues has become increasingly difficult.
These geopolitical divisions are particularly visible during armed conflicts. Differences among major powers have complicated collective responses to crises in Ukraine, Gaza, Sudan, Haiti, and Myanmar. While member states often agree on the humanitarian consequences of these conflicts, they frequently disagree on the political and security measures required to address them. Such disagreements have limited the Organization’s ability to act decisively and have sometimes weakened public confidence in its effectiveness.
Economic inequalities also contribute to institutional tensions. Many developing countries argue that important international institutions continue to reflect the political realities of 1945 rather than those of the twenty-first century. Calls for greater representation of Africa, Latin America, and other developing regions have become increasingly prominent, particularly regarding decision-making within the Security Council and broader questions of global governance.
These challenges should not be interpreted as evidence that the United Nations has failed. Rather, they illustrate the complexity of governing an international community composed of states with diverse political systems, security concerns, and economic interests. The Organization’s greatest strength—its universal membership—is also one of its greatest challenges, since consensus becomes increasingly difficult as international politics become more fragmented.
The Security Council: Strength or Structural Constraint?
The Security Council occupies a unique position within the United Nations because it is the only principal organ empowered to adopt legally binding decisions on international peace and security. Under the UN Charter, it may authorize peacekeeping operations, impose sanctions, and, when necessary, approve the use of force (UN, 1945). This authority has enabled the Council to play a central role in responding to numerous international crises. However, its effectiveness has increasingly been questioned because of its structure and decision-making procedures.
The Council’s greatest strength—its ability to make binding decisions—is also its greatest limitation. The veto power granted to the five permanent members (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) was originally intended to ensure that the major powers remained committed to the Organization. In practice, however, it has often prevented collective action when the strategic interests of one or more permanent members are involved. The inability of the Council to respond decisively to conflicts in Ukraine, Syria, and Gaza has reinforced longstanding criticisms that geopolitical rivalry frequently overrides the collective security objectives of the UN Charter (Mingst & Karns, 2021).
Calls for Security Council reform have therefore intensified. Many states advocate expanding permanent and non-permanent membership to better reflect today’s geopolitical realities, particularly by increasing representation for Africa, Latin America, and other underrepresented regions. Although achieving Charter reform remains politically difficult, a more representative Council would strengthen both the legitimacy and credibility of the United Nations in the twenty-first century (Weiss, 2019).
The Secretary-General and the Moral Voice of the United Nations
While member states determine the political direction of the United Nations, the Secretary-General serves as its chief diplomat and moral voice. Successive Secretaries-General have demonstrated that quiet diplomacy, mediation, and preventive engagement remain essential to the Organization’s effectiveness.
Dag Hammarskjöld strengthened preventive diplomacy during the Cold War and helped define the modern international civil service. Kofi Annan championed human rights, development, and institutional reform while promoting the principle of the Responsibility to Protect. More recently, António Guterres has repeatedly warned that armed conflict, climate change, widening inequality, and declining trust in multilateralism threaten international peace and sustainable development. Although the Secretary-General possesses limited formal authority, the office continues to provide diplomatic leadership capable of encouraging dialogue even when political consensus among major powers proves difficult.
Reforming the Union for a Multipolar World
The challenges confronting the United Nations cannot be addressed solely through institutional reform. They also require renewed political commitment from member states. Nevertheless, several practical reforms could significantly enhance the Organization’s effectiveness.
Reforming the Security Council remains the most widely discussed proposal. While complete agreement may be difficult to achieve, broader regional representation and greater restraint in the use of the veto during humanitarian emergencies would improve both legitimacy and public confidence. Strengthening cooperation among UN agencies would also reduce duplication, improve coordination, and enable more efficient responses to increasingly complex global crises.
Greater investment in preventive diplomacy is equally important. Addressing disputes before they escalate into armed conflict is considerably less costly than responding after violence has begun. The UN should therefore continue strengthening mediation, early warning systems, and regional partnerships capable of supporting peaceful conflict resolution.
Finally, member states must reaffirm their commitment to multilateralism. The United Nations can only function effectively when governments demonstrate the political will to cooperate, respect international law, and place collective responsibility alongside national interests. Institutional reform alone cannot compensate for the absence of political consensus.
The current international environment illustrates this reality. The continuing wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, together with conflicts in Sudan, Haiti, and Myanmar, have exposed both the necessity and the limitations of multilateral diplomacy. They should also serve as a cautionary reminder that prolonged geopolitical confrontation, selective application of international law, and declining confidence in multilateral institutions risk weakening the very international order established to preserve peace after the Second World War. Strengthening the United Nations is therefore not simply an institutional objective but an investment in global stability.
Conclusion
The United Nations remains the cornerstone of contemporary global governance, bringing together virtually every sovereign state to address challenges that no nation can resolve alone. Its achievements in humanitarian assistance, peacekeeping, development, and international law demonstrate the enduring value of multilateral cooperation. Yet persistent geopolitical rivalry, institutional constraints, and an increasingly multipolar international system continue to test its unity and effectiveness.
As the 81st Session of the United Nations General Assembly draws near, member states have a timely opportunity to move beyond rhetorical commitments and demonstrate renewed political will toward meaningful institutional reform, stronger multilateral cooperation, and faithful adherence to the principles of the UN Charter. A true “State of the Union” of the United Nations reveals an institution that is indispensable but under considerable strain. The greatest challenge is therefore not preserving the Organization itself, but strengthening its capacity to unite one world despite its many divisions and to respond more effectively to the complex challenges of the twenty-first century.
References
Acharya, A. (2018). The end of American world order (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Claude, I. L. (1966). Swords into plowshares: The problems and progress of international organization (4th ed.). Random House.
Durch, W. J. (2019). Twenty-first-century peace operations: Lessons from UN missions in Africa and the Middle East. Routledge.
Fidler, D. P. (2019). Global health governance and the United Nations: Lessons from past successes. Cambridge University Press.
Mingst, K. A., & Karns, M. P. (2021). The United Nations in the 21st century (5th ed.). Routledge.
United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter
Weiss, T. G. (2019). What’s wrong with the United Nations and how to fix it (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
